As most expected, confirmed Covid-19 cases are again rising in the US. This time in Southern and South Western states which opened their economies early, rather than the original hotspots in the North East. In response to this, markets have weakened as some plans for the relaxation of lockdowns have been put on hold. Are we about to repeat the experience of the March quarter of this year and crash back into a hard lockdown? For a variety of reasons, we don’t think so. Below, we outline what we think the next six months looks like in terms of economic growth and markets.
The current spike in cases in the US is concerning, however daily deaths have yet to start rising again. This likely reflects the lag between infection and death – normally three to four-weeks. Case growth in the US began to accelerate meaningfully again in mid-June. As a result, we expect deaths to begin increasing again from mid-July.
USA – Covid Daily Cases and Deaths
However, there is a moderate probability that there are fewer relative deaths associated with this reported spike than through March and April, reflecting:
More testing means that reported case numbers now are a better reflection of true case numbers compared to March and April, when reported cases dramatically underestimated actual cases. The number of positive test results in New York City has fallen from 70% in late March to 2% currently.
If the number of deaths remains relatively contained due to these factors, widespread lockdowns are unlikely. In addition, a better understanding of viral transmission means lockdowns can be better targeted at higher risk activities, such as indoor dining and drinking. Masks are also being worn by an increasing percentage of the population and where they are being used, they are effective. This, combined with better hygiene and some physical distancing, should reduce the percentage growth in new cases relative to the initial outbreak.
So, given the above, what does the economic recovery look like? In our estimation, it looks sporadic and disjointed, but ultimately positive. Some activity, which was suppressed by government action but isn’t particularly dangerous, will rebound almost immediately. Construction and much of the manufacturing sector fit into this category. Data related to these sectors will look like a V shaped recovery. Other areas of the economy, such as food services, tourism and entertainment will remain impaired until there is an effective vaccine or treatment. Data related to these sectors will look like an L. Some activity, while dangerous, can be allowed to continue with adaptation. Professional services workers can work from home rather than in offices, university education can be delivered remotely, retail goods can be purchased in store with physical barriers or delivered. Heightened business uncertainty means investment decisions will be delayed, making a recovery in capex look like a U. We see a similar pattern in Chinese economic data (see below chart).
From a consumer perspective, we think sectors representing around 11% of household spending will be seen as dangerous and thus directly affected. However, this 11% doesn’t account for the potential to “pivot” businesses or the extent that some sectors will be impacted less than others. Restaurants aren’t going to disappear, they will just operate at a lower capacity and with more home delivery. Overseas tourism can to some extent be replaced by domestic tourism. Some of the spending that cannot be used for services that are not operating will be redirected to goods (if you are going to be spending more time at home, why not redecorate?) or services that can still be delivered (don’t meet friends at a restaurant, meet at a park with a food truck). Regardless of this pivot, the overall level of this sort of activity will remain impaired until the virus is no longer a threat. We see some evidence of this in mobility data, where physical attendance at workplaces and retail and recreation businesses has flatlined after some recovery.
Applying this profile of recovery to the models we use to forecast earnings growth suggests earnings will not reach their previous peak in Europe until late 2021, in the USA until mid-2022 and well beyond that for Australia, Japan and emerging markets. This is consistent with previous recessions. Following the Financial Crisis, it took three years for US earnings to reach their previous peak. This is a more pessimistic earnings profile than currently forecast by consensus (see below). However, consensus tends to be structurally optimistic and then revise their expectations lower through time. As a result, the gap between our view and the market’s doesn’t necessitate a price reaction.
With equity markets broadly pricing in this near-term environment, expect us to sell into strong market rallies and buy dips in order to take advantage of the ongoing volatility. We see a high chance that if deaths start rising in the USA, it will drive the S&P500 5% to 10% lower from here - back towards 2800 – 3000 which, all else equal, would provide an opportunity to increase risk exposure in the portfolios.
The key short-term risk to this outlook is the impending “fiscal cliffs” in many economies. The fiscal stimulus has been unprecedented, and stopped the lockdowns triggering a global depression, rather than recession. However, it is also time limited. In the USA, on July 31, the additional $600 unemployment benefit per week included in the CARES act will run out. And with unemployment benefits normally lasting 26 weeks, workers who lost their job in March will exhaust all their unemployment benefits in September. If this stimulus is not topped up, it will present a material household income shock. Australia faces a similar challenge at the end of September. If this is not addressed, it would likely be sufficient cause for us to take the portfolios back underweight equity exposure.
We think in this disjointed recovery environment, equity markets will be volatile, but should still outperform cash and bonds. In line with this view, the portfolios are still slightly overweight equity risk relative to their neutral (SAA) allocations. Heightened volatility presents an opportunity for us to add value through tactical asset allocation.
[1] https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1276695443427090432, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53192532
Prepared by Drummond Capital Partners (Drummond) ABN 15 622 660 182, AFSL 534213. It is exclusively for use for Drummond clients and should not be relied on for any other person. Any advice or information contained in this report is limited to General Advice for Wholesale clients only.
The information, opinions, estimates and forecasts contained are current at the time of this document and are subject to change without prior notification. This information is not considered a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold any financial product. The information in this document does not take account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on this information recipients should consider whether it is appropriate to their situation. We recommend obtaining personal financial, legal and taxation advice before making any financial investment decision. To the extent permitted by law, Drummond does not accept responsibility for errors or misstatements of any nature, irrespective of how these may arise, nor will it be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of any reliance on the information included in this document. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
This report is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, we do not make any representation or warranty that it is accurate, complete or up to date. Any opinions contained herein are reasonably held at the time of completion and are subject to change without notice.
-p-500.png)